Urban open space select="/dri:document/dri:meta/dri:pageMeta/dri:metadata[@element='title']/node()"/>

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Fiedeldey Andrè Clemens en_US
dc.contributor.author Harper Sally Anne en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-02T14:10:10Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-02T14:10:10Z
dc.date.issued 19981000 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11070.1/4166
dc.description Includes bibliographical references en_US
dc.description.abstract Summary provided by author: en_US
dc.description.abstract This environmental psychology study is about the potential role of green open space in contributing towards quality of life in the city generally. It is also about a specific, well-loved urban open space in Namibia's capital city, Windhoek, the Avis dam environment, which is often the contentious target of proposed commercial development. At the moment, the Windhoek Municipality has no well-structured urban open space policy, and possibly also no full understanding of the meanings of the Avis dam for its users. This study hopes to make a contribution to both these areas of policy-making en_US
dc.description.abstract As the applicability of reserch findings to the development of public policies and community interventions depends very much on the suitability of the methodology and theories chose (Stokols, 1991), this study begins with a discussion of systemic and ecosystemic thinking [Chapter Two]. They were chosen as the guiding metatheory for this study, not only because of their recognition of the inescapable connectedness between person and environment, but because of their personal appeal too. Chapter Three examines theories and models which are compatible with systems thinking, and which help understand the potentially positive psycho-social and socio-economic roles of urban open space generally, and how the extent of that potential in a specific open space may be appreciated and described en_US
dc.description.abstract The implications of systemic/ecosystemic metatheory for the study's methodology and research design are discussed in Chapter Four, and the data collection methods, which comprised observation and interviewing, in Chapter Five. Ecosystemic thinkers do not believe facts can be "found" [they are not there objectively, but co-emerge subjectively from people's individual and collective experience in a place], so Chapter Six deals with a co-emergent interpretation of the data gathered. Based on that interpretation, recommendations for urban open space policy generally, and the Avis dam environment specifically, are made in Chapter Seven en_US
dc.format.extent 311 p en_US
dc.format.extent ill. (some col.), maps en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.subject Urban areas en_US
dc.subject Urban open space en_US
dc.subject Psychology en_US
dc.title Urban open space en_US
dc.type thesis en_US
dc.identifier.isis F004-199299999999999 en_US
dc.description.degree Pretoria en_US
dc.description.degree South Africa en_US
dc.description.degree University of Pretoria en_US
dc.description.degree MA Research Psychology en_US
dc.masterFileNumber 2498 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record